LLMs.txt Auditor

Structure here means an H1, a blockquote summary, H2 sections, and absolute links. The score adds and subtracts points from those counts, and the math is printed under the total. Comparing with llms-full.txt only checks whether the short index mentions the same sections and links.

Points come from the title, the summary, the section headings, whether sections contain links, whether URLs are absolute, whether descriptions are present, and whether URLs repeat. The result shows that math in full, out of 100, plus counts. It does not look at the live site.

Score is one of the values LLMs.txt Auditor puts on screen. A structure total out of 100. The math is printed under the number. It is not a ranking and not a traffic figure.

Read Title and summary on its own before you mix it with the other rows. The H1 and the blockquote. They contribute points when present. A missing summary costs points. It is still a structure check, not a content review.

Absolute links answers a narrower question than the headline number. URLs should be http or https. Relative URLs are counted. The auditor does not request them.

Treat Duplicates as a label with a specific job. The same URL more than once. The count is shown. Remove repeats in the paste if you want the score to change.

The Full-file compare line is worth a full stop. llms-full.txt is optional. Missing sections or links are warnings. The full file is only what you paste.

If you paste a full file, the auditor warns when its sections or links are missing from the short file, and when the short file points at a URL the full file never mentions. Both files stay on this page. Nothing is uploaded. Edit the paste and run it again. The score will follow the new text only.

If you remember one sequence from LLMs.txt Auditor, remember the fields in the order they change a decision. Score matters because A structure total out of 100. In practice, The math is printed under the number. The mistake to avoid is this: It is not a ranking and not a traffic figure. Title and summary matters because The H1 and the blockquote. In practice, They contribute points when present. The mistake to avoid is this: A missing summary costs points. It is still a structure check, not a content review. Absolute links matters because URLs should be http or https. In practice, Relative URLs are counted. The mistake to avoid is this: The auditor does not request them. Duplicates matters because The same URL more than once. In practice, The count is shown. The mistake to avoid is this: Remove repeats in the paste if you want the score to change. Full-file compare matters because llms-full.txt is optional. In practice, Missing sections or links are warnings. The mistake to avoid is this: The full file is only what you paste. After that, the checks are simple. The score was read with the math. The number was not called a ranking. Relative URLs were counted before you published. The full-file paste was optional and local. Nothing was described as a crawl of the live site.

The worked example for LLMs.txt Auditor, read as one scene, is this. Paste a short file with a title, a summary, one section, and two absolute links that have descriptions. Read the score and the math. The number is only that structure. Paste an llms-full.txt that mentions a section the short file lacks. The auditor warns about the gap. It does not open the URLs.

Final notes for LLMs.txt Auditor, written as decisions rather than as a table. When Score is in front of you, decide using this: A structure total out of 100. It is not a ranking and not a traffic figure. When Title and summary is in front of you, decide using this: The H1 and the blockquote. A missing summary costs points. It is still a structure check, not a content review. When Absolute links is in front of you, decide using this: URLs should be http or https. The auditor does not request them. When Duplicates is in front of you, decide using this: The same URL more than once. Remove repeats in the paste if you want the score to change. When Full-file compare is in front of you, decide using this: llms-full.txt is optional. The full file is only what you paste. Then apply the checks without skipping one. The score was read with the math. The number was not called a ranking. Relative URLs were counted before you published. The full-file paste was optional and local. Nothing was described as a crawl of the live site.

Keep LLMs.txt Auditor as this step only. When the job moves on, the LLMs.txt Checker + Validator is the next page: LLMs.txt Checker reads llms.txt markdown you paste and returns a pass, warning, or fail for the title, summary, sections, and links. The LLMs.txt Generator covers a different piece of the same work: LLMs.txt Generator writes an llms.txt markdown file from a project name, a summary, optional notes, and grouped links.